Archives for category: Entertainment

Road to Perdition [sketch]Every so often when I’m watch­ing a movie I get the urge to sketch, to cap­ture that par­tic­u­lar moment in the film.

As I was watch­ing Road to Perdi­tion the other night I quickly grabbed a note­book, one usu­ally reserved for actual note tak­ing and sketched this from one of the many piv­otal scenes in the movie, this one show­ing the main char­ac­ter and his son trav­el­ing to Chicago.

I hope to do more of these, in this style, over time and shar­ing them and hope­fully next time I’ll use higher qual­ity mate­ri­als, but that said I feel as though some of the charm is attrib­uted to the lo-fi feel of it.

District 9

There’s a scene in Dis­trict 9 when the main char­ac­ter, after endur­ing a lot of pain and humil­i­a­tion, has to make the choice of either run­ning into bat­tle guns ablaze or retreat. He chooses the lat­ter know­ing full well that his actions are dri­ven by fear and selfishness.

Dis­trict 9 or “D9” is many things all rolled up into a hard to describe pack­age. Among them it’s a sci-fi adven­ture with all the ele­ments you’d expect like blaster guns and an enor­mous space­ship. It’s also an unre­lent­ing social com­men­tary and an action-packed romp that refuses to let down its guard.

The effects and cin­e­matog­ra­phy com­pli­ment each other quite well and at times it’s hard to dis­tin­guish between the two. That said, they are not of the slick vari­ety that other films con­vey, but the grimy tex­ture is beau­ti­ful and per­fect for the por­trayal of a enslaved race of aliens liv­ing in South African slums.

It’s an unfor­giv­ing, rav­ished and self­ish envi­ron­ment, leav­ing barely any room for sur­vival. It’s a film that is best expe­ri­enced with­out dig­ging for holes in the plot (of which they are a few) or mak­ing assump­tions deal­ing with the char­ac­ter por­trayal or progression.

I enjoyed it because it didn’t reveal too much of itself and yet what it did expose was raw (human and alien) emo­tion, flaws in the human fab­ric and a detached feel­ing of human­ity, or at least I felt detached at times.

Howard the DuckGeorge Lucas has cre­ated some won­der­ful movies and is unde­ni­ably a vision­ary film­maker, story-teller and influ­ence in the film indus­try. Recently, evi­dence of this has sur­faced in the form of a PDF out­lin­ing the “Raiders” story con­fer­ence.

He’s also respon­si­ble for some real stinkers. Movie stink that could quickly foul a room full of under­de­vel­oped daisies and sel­dom come up in con­ver­sa­tion for fear of one being exiled or worse, thrown to a bunch of rav­en­ous movie crit­ics. Now I’m begin­ning to feel nos­tal­gic for the car­toon, The Critic, but anyways…

Howard the Duck is per­haps the worst movie on George’s resume (yes, fouler than even Clone Wars), failed mis­er­ably at the box office and yet it retains a charm all its own. There are even days when the movie strangely hov­ers around in my thoughts from time to time.

If this were VH1’s Behind the Music, this is the part when the guy would say.. “And now, the story behind the story.”

It all started with some comics

From Wikipedia:

[Howard the Duck] first appeared in Adven­ture into Fear #19 (Dec. 1973) and sev­eral sub­se­quent series have chron­i­cled the mis­ad­ven­tures of the ill-tempered, anthro­po­mor­phic, “funny ani­mal” trapped on human-dominated Earth. Howard’s adven­tures are gen­er­ally social satires, and also often par­o­dies of genre fic­tion with a meta-fictional aware­ness of the medium. [Wikipedia]

If you were to pick up a Howard comic dur­ing this time you’d notice very lit­tle dif­fer­ence between him and Don­ald Duck. This was inten­tional on the part of its cre­ators but for obvi­ous rea­sons wasn’t car­ried over in the movie.

Quack, Quack!

The movie adap­ta­tion, released in 1986, retained some of the traits from the comic in the form of its star, Howard, who was still ill-tempered and anthro­po­mor­phic. Instead of doing an ani­mated fea­ture, which would’ve been an ideal pre­sen­ta­tion, the film was instead live-action and the duck would be part ani­ma­tronic pup­pet, part diminu­tive actor.

It starred a very young Lea Thomp­son and Tim Rob­bins. Tim Rob­bins, up until this point (with Top Gun’s release loom­ing) had been known for bit roles in TV and film. Lea Thomp­son was (and will prob­a­bly always be) known as the Marty McFly’s mother Lor­raine in Back to the Future.

Together, they were sup­port­ing play­ers to their feath­ered star and despite the sub par script and kooky spe­cial effects, man­aged to give some­what con­vinc­ing per­for­mances. How­ever, there is some­thing to be said about the human/duck rela­tion­ship that is, to this day, uncom­fort­able to watch. I don’t think I was ever fully up to speed on the “birds, ducks and bees.”, but I digress.

Above all us, Howard the Duck, like The Dark Crys­tal, was a child­hood favorite of mine because it was some­thing I enjoyed watch­ing with my family.

It was a fan­tas­tic, awful, bewil­der­ing and grossly under­rated cult classic.

The Trailer

Addi­tional Reading:

Ear­lier this week I picked up the book Rogue Lead­ers: The Story of Lucasarts by Rob Smith. There’s an inter­est­ing his­tory that cap­ti­vated me from the get-go, pri­mar­ily because I’m a part of this fas­ci­nat­ing lineage.

Lucasarts & Quan­tum Link

Habitat coverLucasarts (then called Lucas­film Games) was founded by Peter Langston, a musician/game designer who hand-picked a group of young and eager game design­ers to cre­ate orig­i­nal game properties.

In 1985 Lucasarts was work­ing on a Com­modore 64 vir­tual com­mu­nity game (cou­pled with a 300-baud modem attach­ment) called Habi­tat.

In the game you were to cre­ate an “avatar” (yes, they coined the term in this con­text), pick­ing from a selec­tion of col­ors and clothes using the “GET” and “PUT” com­mands and then chat and inter­act with other peo­ple within a some­what graph­i­cal UI.

They part­nered with a com­pany called Quan­tum Link to pro­vide the on-line ser­vice com­po­nent and dis­trib­uted a beta test. How­ever, the game itself proved to be too pop­u­lar and their servers couldn’t han­dle the load, so it was can­celed never mak­ing it to retail.

Mean­while the tech­nol­ogy was sold to Fijitsu in 1989 and was later renamed Club Caribe.

Post­mortem

Lucasarts went on to cre­ate many orig­i­nal gam­ing prop­er­ties (suc­cess­ful adven­ture games like Maniac Man­sion, Grim Fan­dango and Day of the Ten­ta­cle) and Quan­tum Link even­tu­ally changed their name to Amer­ica Online.

The rest is history.

Addi­tional reading:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habitat_(video_game)
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Quantum-Link
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Habitat-(video-game) 

It was ten years ago when I first saw Harry Pot­ter and the Sorcerer’s Stone sit­ting on the shelf at Borders.

I dis­tinctly remem­ber the front cover illus­tra­tion, how col­or­ful it looked from afar and think­ing how geeky the boy on the cover looked with his round glasses and oddly-shaped scar. Yet, because it was a children’s book I fig­ured it wasn’t worth my time.

The Cho­sen One

I would’ve never guessed that not only would I read (and digest) every book in the series and watch every movie to date I would finally say good­bye to such a rich and imag­i­na­tive world and a char­ac­ter that, next to Mickey Mouse, is so well known around the world.

The road to under­stand­ing Harry Pot­ter wasn’t so smooth for me. It took some con­vinc­ing on the part of my best friend’s father, who in his late 40s fig­ured out some­thing that I could not; that children’s books are writ­ten for chil­dren but also meant to be enjoyed by adults.

Adult fic­tion can be stress­ful and com­pli­cated, tak­ing itself too seri­ously at times which is not to say children’s lit­er­a­ture doesn’t stray from com­pli­cated plots, it’s just writ­ten in a man­ner that even at its most basic level a child could understand.

If you think for a moment of the best children’s sto­ries turned to movie adap­ta­tions, sprin­kled in there will be films that prob­a­bly rate high on your all-time favorite list.

A few that come to my mind are:

  • The Wiz­ard of Oz by Frank L. Baum
  • Bambi by Felix Salten
  • Jumaji by Chris Van Allsburg

There are sev­eral oth­ers that have had such a pro­found impact on all of our lives and to think they all began as sto­ries intended for children.

Moral Align­ment

As for Harry Pot­ter, after hav­ing read the first book, I had a cul­ti­vated ini­tia­tive to fin­ish the series to the end. It was my goal and since I’ve reached it there are thoughts that have stayed with me through­out the course of the story.

Many of which deal with the fact that Harry doesn’t fit the mold for a hero. He isn’t bulky, doesn’t have strength beyond his wand and depends on the aide of others.

How­ever, he is the epit­ome of hope and strength to the wiz­ard­ing world, which shares par­al­lels with groups that in a his­tor­i­cal con­text have been sup­pressed in every cul­ture under the sun. While Harry never truly rec­og­nizes his impor­tance, he remains hum­ble and lov­ing and these are traits that ulti­mately keep him on the straight and nar­row, resilient to the evil that is always at bay.

This strug­gle between good and evil, right and wrong, deci­sions based on the protagonist’s moral stand­ing are com­mon threads shared by good lit­er­a­ture. Lit­er­a­ture that pulls you in, makes you feel sor­row and empa­thy and lays the ground­work for the ulti­mate showdown.

A World That Seems Real

While I con­sider myself a healthy reader there’s never been a series that has cap­ti­vated me as much as the Harry Pot­ter story has. I’m a lover of fan­tasy and while the Lord of the Rings books are grandiose, they can be dif­fi­cult to read because the lan­guage itself (explored in depth by Tolkien) is a char­ac­ter unto itself.

The enjoy­ment of read­ing Harry Pot­ter stems from the fact that Rowl­ing doesn’t take her­self too seri­ously and instead has fun with her mate­r­ial. I believe that beyond her shy per­sona is a woman who is witty and con­stantly imag­in­ing things as evi­denced in the books. She man­aged to make read­ing inter­est­ing again for chil­dren and that alone deserves attention.

There’s a lot to like about Harry Pot­ter and for that he’ll remain as real as other char­ac­ters in fic­tion have become. 

Dri­ving home tonight after a deli­cious meal, my daugh­ter, spon­ta­neous as ever, looks up at me and in her best pirate expres­sion growls; “Arghh! I’m a pirate!”.

What fol­lowed was a con­ver­sa­tion between a three-year-old pirate, her par­rot Steve and me, her “Pirate Daddy”.

Zoe: Arggh! I’m a pirate. You are a pirate too.

Me: Avast, ye scurvy sea dog! Y’best walk the plank.

Zoe: Okay. Daddy, this plank is heavy. I can’t carry it.

Me: (laugh­ing) I said walk the plank, not carry it.

Zoe: I put it down here. That was so heavy, Pirate Daddy.

Me: Shiver me tim­bers! Where be your par­rot, Steve?

Zoe: He flewed away! In the sky. Argggh!

Me: Yar! Next time keep an eye on Steve. A pirate isn’t a pirate with­out his parrot.

Zoe: Hand me a map. We need to go there. (points) And where we’re there, we then go here.
 

The Breakfast ClubThe Break­fast Club is a movie that can be taken at face value or you can read into a bit more if you want to.

Which is why it’s an excel­lent film and one I highly rec­om­mend for repeated view­ings — if any­thing to see how much all of the actors (aside from Alley Sheedy and Molly Ring­wald) have aged.

Here are some thoughts/notes I jot­ted down as I was watch­ing The Break­fast Club recently (via Netflix’s Watch Now fea­ture) for the umpteenth time:

  • Sub­tleties in the act­ing, espe­cially Judd Nel­son (as Ben­der), empow­er­ing a dys­func­tional char­ac­ter with an emo­tional performance.
  • Prin­ci­pal Vernon’s feel­ings on the lack of respect he receives from stu­dents, which seems a bit too much like self pity.
  • The group as a whole com­ing to the real­iza­tion that while they all seem dif­fer­ent, deep down, they are all the same.
  • Seg­re­ga­tion by pop­u­lar­ity and on the other side of the spec­trum, lack thereof, con­tin­ues to exist.
  • The Jock and the Geek seem so dif­fer­ent (mind over mat­ter, vice-versa), and yet each share sim­i­lar traits: par­ents have high expec­ta­tions, social norms, segregation.
  • The attrac­tions between oppos­ing social “clas­si­fi­ca­tions”; rebel and prom queen, jock and men­tal case.
  • Jan­i­tor Carl as the key holder; the eyes and ears of the school, dis­re­spected and yet more lev­el­headed than most.

If you’ve seen the movie please feel free to share some of your observations. 

Update: Thanks to the gen­eros­ity of Joost allow­ing unlim­ited invites every­one who added a com­ment and those who leave a com­ment from this point on will receive an invite.

Joost [logo]For weeks on end I’ve been patiently wait­ing for a Joost beta invite. Why am I so excited about some­thing that on the sur­face seems like Tivo™ for the web?

There’s an easy answer for that, so let me spill it. Before I do that how­ever, I’d like to thank Paul for send­ing me the invite.

Joost Oozes With Quality

It doesn’t take a spe­cial decoder ring to fig­ure out what Joost does. The offi­cial site describes its func­tion­al­ity quite perfectly:

The magic of tele­vi­sion, with the power of the inter­net built right in. Joost puts you in con­trol, and TV will never be the same again.

This could be con­strued as a bold claim, as if the creators/developers/masterminds (the peo­ple respon­si­ble for Skype and Kazaa) behind this oper­a­tion could not pos­si­bly con­vince them­selves otherwise.

Yet, when you con­nect the dots, eval­u­at­ing the whole enchi­lada for a ser­vice like this (brand­ing, web site and tech­nol­ogy) you can’t help but be enthralled by the polish.

Spec­trums, Rain­bows and Magic

Have you ever looked through a spec­trum? There’s a infi­nite amount of col­ors that appear if you hold one up to a light source. It’s inter­est­ing that the cre­ators of Joost chose to theme their ser­vice around the con­cept of spec­trums and color vari­ety. Although, I must admit they do look a bit like col­ored Kryp­tonite, not that there’s any­thing wrong with that.

Ear­lier today I was doing my best to describe the pro­mo­tional video on the What’s Joost? sec­tion to a friend. Halfway into explain­ing how cool it was I real­ized it’s just one of those things you have to see for yourself.

At first glance the demon­stra­tion video seems a bit awk­ward, or at least it did to me. After watch­ing it I real­ized it seems famil­iar and that’s because it’s some­what like a med­ley of Bat­ter­ies Not Included, Cocoon, The Last Starfighter and Tron. Like I said, you need to see it first­hand because my descrip­tion just won’t cut it.

Beta Means Slim Pickings

I would say that my only beef with the ser­vice is that the chan­nel offer­ings are slim at best and the video out­put ranges from near DVD qual­ity to sub par Youtube qual­ity. One moment it looks great, the next it just dis­tracts from the over­all expe­ri­ence but I’m sure in time it’ll improve.

As far as the con­tent is con­cerned other than watch­ing some “vin­tage” Ren & Stimpy car­toons with my daugh­ter and a cou­ple Dis­cov­ery Chan­nel spe­cials on lions and pyra­mids, there’s noth­ing else that peaks my inter­est for the time being.

That will change as Joost con­tin­ues to sign con­tent providers but in the interim there just isn’t a lot to con­sume at the moment. Although, this is still in beta so that’s just par for the course. Joost has promised to con­tinue sign­ing con­tent providers; for instance, they just added a vari­ety of shows from providers like Com­edy Cen­tral, VH1 (the chan­nel you switch on when you’re bored, or, at least I do) and MTV.

Beta Invites

If you haven’t expe­ri­ence Joost yet, well, that’s just not right. I’ll tell you what, leave a com­ment and I’ll use the magic of the inter­nets (and a handy script to ran­domly select a num­ber) to choose three lucky peo­ple to send an invite to.

Ready, set, go! 

After 4 years of writ­ing, off and on, about a vari­ety of things such as odd thoughts, close calls, suc­cess (and fail­ure) and other things now rel­e­gated to the archives, it’s time to switch direc­tions and start anew.

From the get go I’ve always envi­sioned this site as an out­let for exper­i­men­tal cre­ativ­ity and to share the results of such with whomever was interested.

This site’s focus was never meant to be excluded to just a blog, but due to my inter­ests in cre­ative writ­ing it just remained. Like Anton, I’ve been ready for quite some time to move away from just being a blog and realign (not that kind of realign­ment) my inter­ests and the inten­tions of this site.

For his­tor­i­cal preser­va­tion, I’ve decided to select the best arti­cles from the archives and com­pile them into a book because I’d hate to see those dis­ap­pear. Besides, I’d like to do some self-publishing and Lulu has me more than intrigued.

A Fresh Restart

What this means is that I’ll be tran­si­tion­ing the blog, or what you’re read­ing now, into a small, but impor­tant por­tion of the site. If you can think of it as the con­ver­sa­tion that takes place after you’ve con­sumed a three-course meal, then you’ll under­stand what its pur­pose will be.

The main course of the meal will be the illus­tra­tion and design, wrapped together in a fresh and fun lay­out that’ll hope­fully immerse you in what I’ll have to offer. (Speak­ing of which, have you seen the new Squidfin­gers design?)

As corny as this might sound, I do appre­ci­ate each and every one of you who con­tin­ues to sub­scribe to, read and inter­act with kar­tooner. There are plenty of you who should be proud of your design prowess and mea­sure of intel­lect. With­out you, I’d just be a guy with one of them-there blog thin­gies here in New York. In other words, chan­nel­ing the mantra of Chris J. Davis, “You rawk!”.

Catch­ing up with Goals

Part of the rea­son I’m so adamant about chang­ing some things is because I need to finally meet my goal of fin­ish­ing my comic. Yes, that comic, the one I’ve been talk­ing about for a lit­tle over 2 years! After mix­ing it up with my friends at SXSW this year and absorb­ing the enthu­si­asm, I’ve come to the con­clu­sion that I need to not just pur­sue, but chase after and tackle my goals.

I could just keep mak­ing excuses or con­tinue play­ing trash bas­ket­ball to bide the time, but that wasn’t why I chose this career in the first place. This is a jour­ney of explo­ration and fas­ci­na­tion that we’re all on, and I’m mov­ing up a cou­ple seats to see the full view.

Process and Innovation

On my panel at SXSWi this year I men­tioned doing con­cep­tual sketches for Sidev­ille, using the movie Pirates of the Car­ribean as one of my source mate­ri­als. I fore­see using the blog to post my work in progress, kind of like Car­son System’s Bare Naked App but with­out the app and the bare naked­ness. It seems like peo­ple are inter­ested in the process and craft of devel­op­ing a project and appre­ci­ate that mis­takes are made along the way.

As per­fect as the end result might be, suc­cess needs to be con­stantly fine-tuned and rec­og­niz­ing trail and error is part of that process. Every bril­liant and suc­cess­ful busi­ness or idea has to be built from the ground up and the vision­ary at the fore­front of things needs to keep inno­vat­ing and mov­ing forward.

Sure, a lot of what suc­cess can be might seem serendip­i­tous, but it’s the cru­cial ele­ment of keep­ing one’s eye on their goals that makes it both chal­leng­ing and rewarding.

To sum it all up, I’ve got an idea and it’s time to take that from con­cept to real­ity. Join me

Full House Cast If you grew up in the mid-80s like I did, you prob­a­bly remem­ber Full House, a whole­some fam­ily sit­com that first aired Sep­tem­ber 22nd, 1987 and had a run of almost ten years, end­ing in May 1995.

The premise of the show was rather sim­ple and mostly sugar-coated and the issues were, for the most part, con­tem­po­rary. Basi­cally, it cen­tered on a wid­owed father named Danny Tan­ner (per­formed by Bob “America’s Fun­ni­est Videos” Saget) who is respon­si­ble for rais­ing his three chil­dren; D.J. (Can­dace Cameron), Stephanie (Jodie Sweetin) and Michelle (famously per­formed by both of the Olsen Twins; Mary-Kate and Ash­ley) after his wife is trag­i­cally killed in a car accident.

To help raise his chil­dren and soothe the heal­ing process over los­ing his wife Danny enlists sup­port from Joey Glad­stone (Dave Coulier), his best friend from his old high school days, and his wife’s younger brother Jesse Kat­sopo­lis (John Sta­mos). Through­out the course of the show, every character–especially the children–deals with typ­i­cal sit­com issues like drug use, safe sex, moral­ity, dat­ing, you name it, it was most likely cov­ered and then dis­cussed with sin­cer­ity and emotion.

It seems like every­one can asso­ciate them­selves with a par­tic­u­lar char­ac­ter or rather dis­as­so­ci­ate them­selves for some rea­son or another. What­ever your rea­son­ing might be for lik­ing or dis­lik­ing a char­ac­ter, it’s an inter­est­ing study nonetheless.

Con­sider for a moment that you hap­pen to like a char­ac­ter purely because they seem socia­ble and agree­able in most cases and like­wise you con­sider these virtues a part of your own personality.

On the other hand, you might enjoy a char­ac­ter because they aren’t like you at all. They may be dis­hon­est, heart­less or shal­low and you enjoy this because it’s an alter­nate ver­sion of your­self or it’s just enter­tain­ing, that or the actor per­forms the part in a dys­func­tional and yet appeal­ing man­ner, maybe comed­ically or straight­for­ward, what­ever the case you enjoy that character.

Which is why I’m con­duct­ing a ran­dom poll (by ran­dom I mean, hey you had no idea I’d do this) on who your favorite char­ac­ter is from Full House is. There is no sci­en­tific rea­son­ing behind this other than just for curios­ity and fun. Please, feel free to par­tic­i­pate in the poll and leave any com­ments as to why you chose a par­tic­u­lar char­ac­ter over another.

I’m using PollPub, a shiny Web 2.0 polling ser­vice to see how this turns out.

The Poll

Accord­ing to cur­rent poll results (as of Feb­ru­ary 12th) Jesse Kat­sopo­lis is win­ning by a land­slide with 67% of the vote. Does this mean I should have some “Uncle Jesse for Pres­i­dent” t-shirts printed up?

Please use the direct link (served by PollPub on their servers) for the poll: Who is your favorite char­ac­ter on Full House?