The Mythology of Heroes

December 6, 2006

Heroes [stillframe]If you haven’t seen NBC’s Heroes, I’d sug­gest either Tivo’ing it or watch­ing it every Mon­day (9PM/EST). Next to Lost, it’s been one of the only shows in recent years that I’ve been so involved with — includ­ing hav­ing side con­ver­sa­tions with friends and fam­ily — and that’s due to a few fac­tors that make the show so engrossing.

Apart from the great act­ing, the writ­ing con­tin­ues to amaze me because the story is chock full of inter­est­ing twists, turns and free falls.

There are so many lay­ers and angles the writ­ers have cho­sen to explore and the story itself is rich in char­ac­ter explo­ration and inter­ac­tion. At it’s sur­face it seems like just a show about peo­ple with var­i­ous tal­ents and pow­ers, but if you look fur­ther you begin to unravel the puz­zle and mythol­ogy that is Heroes, which tran­scends the small screen in the form of an online comic and web blog.

Over the course of the first sea­son I’ve made some men­tal notes (mostly spoiler-free) and I’d like to share some of those with you. In turn, I invite you to share your own, as I know we all have our own thoughts and the­o­ries on where the story arch might lead and where it’ll con­tinue to go.

The­o­ries on Heroes

  • Bib­li­cal names used for some of the main char­ac­ters; Gabriel (arch angel), Mica, Eden and Peter.
  • Over­all story arch (so far) has a delib­er­ate sense of urgency and fore­shad­ow­ing: some plot points uncov­ered, ques­tions both answered and unanswered
  • Reminds me a bit of Steven King’s The Stand in that a group of peo­ple, who pre­vi­ously had no con­tact with each other, have come together for a greater purpose
  • The writ­ing is multi-faceted and intrigu­ing, much like Lost, and while it’s inten­tion­ally seri­al­ized it does seem more self-contained than Lost.
  • The char­ac­ters them­selves and their sto­ries are intrigu­ing because of the emo­tional state they share; urgency and for the most part a deep rooted nonac­cep­tance of their tal­ents, almost a resilient self-doubt.
  • Hiro (named appro­pri­ately) comes across as the glue hold­ing every­thing together. He seems to be the favorite for most view­ers and that’s because of his per­son­al­ity and will­ing­ness to work within the lim­i­ta­tions of his power.
  • Mr. Ben­nett (Claire’s father and code­named: HRG for Horned Rim Glasses) seems almost as if his align­ment is neu­tral. He’ll pro­tect those he cares for, but also obeys his supe­ri­ors’ wishes. The writ­ers have men­tioned that he is a but a cog in the big­ger wheel that is his employer and at the moment their true inten­tions and/or motives are still unclear
  • The Hait­ian, while mys­te­ri­ous and obey­ing of HRG’s com­mands, seems like he has his own motives beyond the scope of his employer


Now, what about your the­o­ries?
If you have some, please share by com­ment­ing or send­ing me an email at erik(at)kartooner.com.
 

7 comments

You can also check out all the episodes at NBC.com :)

Per­son­ally, I’m REALLY enjoy­ing the show… so much so that it’s the only one I’ll con­sis­tently watch week to week. I don’t really have any spoiler-free the­o­ries to post, so I’ll save those for another time. How­ever, I will just say that I think Lin­der­man will play a larger role in this series and the Heroes’ lives. He comes up way too often for him not to be involved some­how. Who knows… maybe he’s Bennett’s boss!?

by Joshua Lane on December 6, 2006 at 8:14 pm. Reply #

Hey Josh, thanks for your excel­lent input. For­got about NBC putting the episodes online! Good tip.

You know, I hadn’t thought about the Linderman/Mr. Ben­nett con­nec­tion but in the con­text of the story I wouldn’t be surprised!

As you men­tioned, he does come up an awful lot as far as the yin/yang rela­tion­ship he has with the Petrelli broth­ers; Nathan’s polit­i­cal fund­ing pro­vided by Lin­der­man and Peter’s dis­gust with the guy.

It’s such an involv­ing, and at the same time almost dizzy­ing show, that it’s often dif­fi­cult to con­nect the dots.

(oh, and as a side note, hop­ing to see you at SXSW ’07)

by kartooner on December 7, 2006 at 1:03 am. Reply #

I’ll start by say­ing that this is one of the most thrilling shows I’ve seen in a while. 24 is a thrilling show, but like you said about Lost, Heroes is a lot more self contained.

One inter­est­ing point that I’d like to bring up: Hiro learned that he can’t go back and change the past, so I’m curi­ous about how him going back to the past (present?) and stop­ping the explosion.

by Paul O'Shannessy on December 7, 2006 at 6:16 am. Reply #

Paul: Yeah it is thrilling, that’s for sure.

As for Hiro, I think he hasn’t tapped into the true poten­tial of his pow­ers and hope­fully they reveal more of that next sea­son (start­ing Jan­u­ary 22nd).

Oh, and as Joshua pointed out and I’ll just men­tion here as well, NBC has put up every episode of Heroes online. This is great for peo­ple who missed it the first time around and for those who want to see some of the ear­lier episodes to piece together things.

by kartooner on December 7, 2006 at 1:46 pm. Reply #

I think between Peter and Hiro, they both have some untapped poten­tial. They seem more likely to explore and prac­tice (aka, improve) their abil­i­ties while oth­ers might be shy­ing away from them.

For exam­ple, I sus­pect Hiro will even­tu­ally be able to bring oth­ers with him when he con­trols time/space. And I have a feel­ing Peter will even­tu­ally be able to hold on to the pow­ers he gets from oth­ers… beyond when he’s just with them.

by Joshua Lane on December 7, 2006 at 6:31 pm. Reply #

Hi Erik,

It’s been awhile since I’ve gone to the site and writ­ten in the com­ments, but I had to with this post. I also really enjoy Heroes, though I think it’s not nearly as good as Lost, it’s still well done. Any­way, here’s a some of my notes that I debated with the roommates:

- Syler is NOT going to end up being the main vil­lian. This may be hard to believe, but I’m going off of comic book the­ory here. While he’s capa­ble of caus­ing a lot of dam­age, I doubt he has the means to destroy the world. His motives don’t match. In fact, I wouldn’t be sur­prised if he ends up help­ing the Heroes tem­porar­ily à la Han­ni­bal Lecter. Every time I think of him I think Mag­neto because of this anti-hero/villian strad­dling, but they’re really dif­fer­ent types of vil­lians.
– The “end­ing” shown in the last episode is most likely not going to be the destruc­tion of the world that is being pre­dicted, but part of a much larger scheme of things. It’s cer­tainly a plau­si­ble event though.
– I really like the idea of Syler being a foil for Peter due to sim­i­lar­i­ties in their pow­ers. It makes me think of Sher­lock Holmes and Mori­arty or sev­eral comic book neme­ses (Spiderman/Venom, Wolverine/Sabertooth). I hope that they estab­lish it more, but since Heroes focuses on sev­eral peo­ple I doubt they would. It’d take too much time away from other characters.

by Chris McDougall on December 15, 2006 at 9:16 pm. Reply #

@Josh: That would be really, really cool if Hiro could bring some­one with him when he trav­els “through-a time and ah, space”. I also believe that Ted might har­ness the power of the explo­sion and poten­tially save the lives of the other heroes, but we’ll see. At this point any­thing goes.

@Chris: Like­wise, I too believe that Sylar is not the main vil­lian, but just one of many that the Heroes will encounter. Although, they’ve fleshed him out enough where I could see him stay­ing through the course of next sea­son and I hope he does.

Even­tu­ally Peter might be able to absorb a spe­cific power and har­ness it for much longer than he can now. If that’s the case, he too could play a part in sav­ing the Heroes, rather than aid­ing in the destruc­tion, as he has con­vinced him­self so far.

by kartooner on December 16, 2006 at 1:14 am. Reply #

Leave your comment

Required.

Required. Not published.

If you have one.