At what point does some­one become so depen­dent on tech­nol­ogy that in our world of instan­ta­neous feed­back we for­get the virtues of patience and per­sonal cultivation?

We live in an era where cell phones, PDA’s and MP3 play­ers are always within a finger’s reach and our depen­dency on these tech­no­log­i­cal gad­gets are such that we rely on them to com­mu­ni­cate or enter­tain with one another.

In essence we’ve turned into a “Microwave Gen­er­a­tion”, which can be explained in two parts; one, that our reliance on tech­nol­ogy has become so “all con­sum­ing” and com­mon­place that with­out it we’d be in a state of shock and two, we as human beings want every­thing now (59 sec­onds or less it seems). Look around you, there’s a “fast, quick, instant, speedy” ser­vice to just about any­thing you can think of includ­ing espres­sos, fast food, med­ical check­ups and oil changes.

I had a brief dis­cus­sion about this with Matt Bur­ris and Bryan Veloso who both had their own opin­ions to share.

Matt Bur­ris:

There are con­se­quences to every­thing, includ­ing try­ing to make our lives eas­ier. In essence, we’re being weak­ened, and if we had an event that wiped out elec­tric­ity in the world, lots of peo­ple would die because they wouldn’t be able to fit into the whole sur­vival of the fittest the­ory any­more, which wouldn’t be applic­a­ble because we rely too much on so many things to make our lives easier.

Our sur­vival instinct has been dulled to the point where it isn’t there any­more. When the tsunami raced towards South­east Asia, the birds and ani­mals, even those in the zoo, went towards higher grounds before it even hit. Yet humans didn’t detect some­thing wrong. How­ever, native tribes with none of the [mod­ern con­ve­niences] we have, knew about and had pre­pared for the tsunami before it hit. They knew because they still have that instinct.

If you put a man from the 16th cen­tury next to a man in today’s age in nature, the man from the 16th cen­tury would fare a lot bet­ter than the mod­ern man.

Bryan Veloso (in response to the above):

That makes too many assump­tions. Also, a 16th cen­tury man has a shorter life span, and lower lit­er­acy rate and a higher chance of get­ting dis­eases. Sure they MAY have been able to out­last some­body from today in the wild but we all have that instinct that is acti­vated when needed.

What do you think?