Invention Contention

September 22, 2005

VacuumThere’s an episode of the Simp­sons where Homer, in com­plete dis­gust of how unevent­ful his 38.1 years have been, decides to use Thomas Edi­son as a men­tor to invent new things in his shadow. He believes by fol­low­ing in Edison’s foot­steps he’ll be able to give mean­ing to his oth­er­wise drab life.

After test­ing a series of inven­tions on his fam­ily, includ­ing a shotgun-projecting makeup gun and an elec­tric ham­mer, he set­tles on what he con­sid­ers his most prized inven­tion; a chair with emer­gency kick­stand legs for some­one who tilts too far back. How­ever, no sooner is he excited at this new prospect he real­izes while closely look­ing at a photo of Edi­son, that Edi­son him­self invented the exact same thing a cou­ple hun­dred years prior.

He then — with Bart’s help — attempts to destroy the chair at an Edi­son museum with his elec­tric ham­mer and even­tu­ally recon­sid­ers his plan of destruc­tion. Being the absent-minded guy Homer is, he leaves behind his elec­tric ham­mer inven­tion and the media mis­tak­ens it for a miss­ing Edi­son invention.

Over the years I’ve come up with silly inven­tions that wouldn’t nec­es­sar­ily change the world, but it’s pos­si­ble they might make some­one else’s job eas­ier. For exam­ple, I was a jan­i­tor for 6 years and often I’d come up with lit­tle inven­tions to stream­line the clean­ing process. One of which was a solar-powered vac­uum that would oper­ate with­out the need for a cord, which is a has­sle in itself when archi­tects and build­ing plan­ners for­get to put in a suf­fi­cient amount of outlets.

There were many instances where out­lets would be sev­eral feet apart and if you only have a 3040 foot cord to work with you begin to under­stand why it becomes an issue. Even with the aide of an exten­sion, it still can be a pain to men­tally map out how you can get from Point D to Point G.

I’m sure a cord­less (non-battery pow­ered) vac­uum patent is filed some­where at the US Patent Office, but it’s odd that we’ve never seen nor heard of some­thing sim­il­iar on the mar­ket. As is the case for many patented inven­tions, the rea­sons for that par­tic­u­lar inven­tion not being man­u­fac­tured boils down to cost. If it’s too expen­sive to cre­ate the prod­uct then it’ll just sit in limbo until the sup­plies become cheaper, of if the inven­tion itself can be modified.

Often I won­der when the hov­er­craft from Back to the Future will make its debut or the per­sonal fly­ing machine that was sup­pos­edly going to be a wel­come pack­age for the 21st cen­tury, at least accord­ing to the movies. What ever hap­pened to the cities above the clouds and below the ocean? For the time being these ideas will remain pure sci­ence fic­tion until the Wright Broth­ers of our time make them reality.

Are there any inven­tions that you’ve come up with or ones you’ve heard about that you would like to see the light of day? 

10 comments

To answer your ques­tion about the per­sonal fly­ing machine and fly­ing cars: I’m reminded of an IBM com­mer­cial I saw about a year ago where the guy’s stand­ing in front of a free­way say­ing “where are all the fly­ing cars?” and then he says that the rea­son why we never both­ered with them was because of the Inter­net. That, because we’re able to com­mu­ni­cate so quickly over such vast areas via the ‘net, it negates the need to fly really fast a-la Jet­sons to the per­son you need to com­mu­ni­cate with. I guess you could say telecom­mut­ing killed the fly­ing car (star).

Cool inven­tion BTW, the solar pow­ered vacuum.

by Ara Pehlivanian on September 22, 2005 at 10:49 am. Reply #

Ara: I believe I can under­stand the logic in that state­ment, even if it’s a bit faint. Too bad though, I really want to zip around above the clut­tered roads. One thing I’ve won­dered about, in regards to fly­ing cars, is how would you land one?

by kartooner on September 22, 2005 at 11:42 am. Reply #

I use a cord­less vac­uum every day. It’s just smaller than the nor­mal ones. But it works!

by Pauly D on September 22, 2005 at 11:56 am. Reply #

Sure I have — as in salad bars. Not as in a restau­rant offer­ing ‘rab­bit food’ mind you, but more lit­er­ally — like gra­nola bars, but done with veg­eta­bles, dress­ing pack (and frozen of course). Sort of like a solid V-8 if you will. It would be a per­fectly guilt-less snack for those who can’t wait until lunch or din­ner, yet have a hard time find­ing a snack that doesn’t com­pro­mise their calo­ries count or is basi­cally unhealthy. And well, as daily life becomes more demand­ing and accel­er­ated it’s just get­ting harder to find time to cook. If you see frozen bur­ri­tos being sold I can’t see why some­thing like this couldn’t be done.

by beto on September 22, 2005 at 12:48 pm. Reply #

I’d like some­one to develop a really large hel­met (think Space­balls) that rips the blog posts out of my brain, types them up and posts them to my site. Is that really too much to ask? Where are you when I need you Edison?

Also, if some­one could invent a self-coiling water hose for my neigh­bor, that would be fantastic.

by Greg on September 22, 2005 at 1:06 pm. Reply #

Pauly D: I for­got about the good ol’ Black and Decker hand­held, cord­less vacs. Those don’t count how­ever since I was refer­ring to mostly com­mer­cial vacuums.

Beto: Nifty idea, Alberto! A solid­i­fied V8 stick for those on the run, now why didn’t I think of that?

Greg: An auto­mated blog­ging hel­met would be nice indeed. How­ever, just how auto­mated would it be? Could you dou­blecheck to make sure you didn’t include any non-relevant thoughts?

For instance, think­ing to your­self; “Man, I really need to exfo­li­ate.” I’m pretty sure peo­ple read­ing about “Salad Bars” would seem it to be a bit jar­ring if all of a sud­den they read you needed to shed skin.

by kartooner on September 22, 2005 at 2:17 pm. Reply #

Yea, I have an inven­tion I am still look­ing into. I really don’t want to give it out at this time (yes, I am para­noid of peo­ple steal­ing it :) ), but have you ever been to a Home-A-Rama. We have them here in Indi­anapo­lis, and it’s basi­cally where you can go view these multi mil­lion dol­lar homes that are just LUSH. They are amazing.

My inven­tion would be for the bed­room and it includes flow­ing water. I have no idea if it’s been invented yet (hope not). How­ever, it’s the type of inven­tion that prob­a­bly only rich peo­ple would have an inter­est in. That could be a good thing if it can actu­ally make money.

Nice design Erik. I like it.

by Bryan on September 22, 2005 at 3:49 pm. Reply #

One time I met some­one who had invented a toi­let plunger — I can’t temem­ber what it did bet­ter than the reg­u­lar toi­let plunger, but it did sound good. I asked him if he had applied for a patent. He said that he hadn’t. Had any­one else? Shrug of shoul­ders. So, I went on-line and about 20 min­utes later I printed out ‘his’ plunger. Sure enough, some­one held a patent on it and had for a while.

I think that inven­tors are born, not made. Oth­er­wise why would some peo­ple be con­stantly invent­ing things? As to the solar-powered vac­uum — think about all the win­dows you’d need. And waht about in the win­ter when the sun is low? The battery-powered ones don’t work worth piss. they’re only good for small jobs.

My prob­lem is that I’m always ‘eat­ing’ the cord of the vac­uum with the suc­tion. Not good for longevity of said vac­uum or user.

by anon on September 25, 2005 at 3:24 pm. Reply #

anon: Yeah, I sup­pose you’re right about the dis­ad­van­tages of hav­ing a solar-powered vac­uum on hand, but there’s that sliver of hope that it would actu­ally ben­e­fit some­one out there in the field of cleaning.

Every inven­tion has its pluses and minuses as far as usabil­ity and design is con­cerned. :) Sad, but true.

by kartooner on September 25, 2005 at 11:27 pm. Reply #

About your vac­uum idea. I don’t think the whole bat­tery pow­ered vac­uum couldn’t work cur­rently as we don’t have bat­ter­ies that are light enough but pow­er­ful enough to power a vac­uum for an extended period of time. Plus you run into prob­lems of bat­ter­ies los­ing strength over time (ie. the iPod) and needed replac­ing, which would be very expen­sive for a bat­tery that large.

as for why things like fly­ing cars and meals that are the size of a pill don’t exist yet, would be that even by today’s stan­dards these are redicu­lous ideas. Not only were they out­landish in the 50’s, by even today in 2006 it seems unlikely we will see them in our lifetime.

Just my thoughts.

by Seth Kravitz on January 6, 2006 at 5:45 pm. Reply #

Leave your comment

Required.

Required. Not published.

If you have one.