It’s evident that Michael Heilemann of Binary Bonsai received enough emails in regards to his site’s theme that he decided to release Kubrick. On a similar note, I’ve been receiving a few emails in regards to using the kartooner.com “theme” for other personal projects.

At first I was a bit surprised that anyone would want to use this design. I suppose it’s the perfectionist in me, but I’m not 100% satisfied with the look of this site. Granted, it’s my best layout yet for kartooner.com, but to me it’s just another layout under constant scrutiny. It seems like everyday that I’m tweaking various aspects of this site, whether it be stylesheet or graphic oriented.

In my attempt to prevent constant redesigns I’ve settled on this theme for the time being. Yet, I can’t guarantee myself or my readers that I won’t change this design in the next 6 months. One of the great aspects of a personal web site is the freedom to experiment with fresh layouts.

If you’re a well-known designer with a blog, like Dave Shea or Jeffrey Zeldman, you might face an onslaught of disgruntled comments, but smaller sites like mine with only a handful of readers rarely receive any negative or positive feedback on redesigns. When we do, however, it’s like receiving a response from the Dali Lama. Let’s be honest, it’s always nice to receive positive feedback and constructive criticism but negative feedback? That’s like receiving a slap in the face in most cases.

That said, I guess what I’m getting at is this: Should I let other interested Wordpress bloggers adopt this site’s theme, if proper credit is given? Maybe I should apply for a Creative Commons license to retain my copyright, but allow copy and distribution on the grounds that credit is properly displayed. However, what is the process in tracking legitimate and illegitimate uses of your work?