Rain That Flew in Sideways

May 24, 2004

Thunderstorm

In the past few days we’ve been expe­ri­enc­ing tor­ren­tial down­pour here in the East. When I woke up this morn­ing and looked out the win­dow I thought I had woken up to that part in the Wiz­ard of Oz when the tor­nado wrecks havoc on Dorothy’s farm.

I also kept think­ing of a line in For­rest Gump, when Tom Hanks as For­rest is trudg­ing through the Viet­nam land­scape, and men­tions in one his let­ters that there was;

Lit­tle bitty stin­gin’ rain… and big ol’ fat rain. Rain that flew in side­ways. And some­times rain even seemed to come straight up from underneath.

Due to the sever­ity of the weather I decided to take the streets instead of the high­way and hydroplaned through sev­eral pud­dles almost tak­ing out a ser­vice­man on the side of the road. At this same point in time I glanced back in my rearview mir­ror and noticed the cher­ries blaz­ing in the dis­tance. At first I thought I had been speed­ing, but dis­counted that fear when I real­ized I was dri­ving just a smidge over 20 MPH.

Then the cop, who was going faster than a speed­ing bul­let, almost side­swiped that same ser­vice­man who I nearly decom­mis­sioned. Not that it was par­tic­u­lar funny or any­thing, but I was reminded of an 80’s movie where the dis­grun­tled city worker shakes his fist at the pass­ing cars as Talk­ing Heads’ Burn­ing Down the House plays in the background. 

6 comments

The weather’s been fun lately, indeed. We didn’t have to leave the house, so we just enjoyed the killer lightnings.

by Jarek Piórkowski on May 24, 2004 at 11:41 am. Reply #

Last week we had five days of con­ti­nous, non­stop rain in Par­adise. Now, we’re in the mid­dle of rain­for­est and all, but it never rains for five days in a row non­stop. It was get­ting on my nerves.

Now we finally have sun­shine again.… on a Mon­day, stuck at work. :P

by beto on May 24, 2004 at 11:41 am. Reply #

Oh, and nice pic­ture. Too bad I for­got to take any. Plus, our camera’s pretty crappy.

by Jarek Piórkowski on May 24, 2004 at 11:42 am. Reply #

Jarek: The thun­der and light­ning here has been louder than I’ve ever remem­bered. I must’ve jumped about 45 times last night not antic­i­pat­ing the loud clash and sud­den vibra­tion. Although, I will say that the light­ning was very cool last night.

When I was dri­ving my daugh­ter over to my inlaws there were ran­dom spurts of light on the street. It was awesome.

Beto: 5 days of non­stop rain? Wow. I think I would go mad, or at the very least, “Coo-coo for Cocoa Puffs”. Since you’re in the mid­dle of the rain­for­est, what’s your take on these ‘Save the Rain­for­est’ cam­paigns? My friends from Brazil say it’s all polit­i­cal fluff, men­tion­ing that there is plenty of rain­for­est to go around.

Also, com­pletely unre­lated to this con­ver­sa­tion, but, I finally incor­po­rated graph­i­cal head­ers for the side­bar and used Mike Rundle’s Acces­si­ble Image Replace­ment tech­nique.

by kartooner on May 24, 2004 at 12:23 pm. Reply #

Now that’s a dif­fer­ent story. Even though I do get scared by loud sud­den noises very eas­ily, I didn’t jump. Although the entire sky was illu­mi­nated mul­ti­ple times, there was always a rea­son­able delay between the light­ning and the thun­der and the lat­ter was more of a growl­ing kind.

Rochester is right on Lake Ontario, cor­rect? That might be part of the rea­son why, Welland’s in the mid­dle of the Nia­gara Penin­sula, at least 20km to clos­est lake (Erie).

Regard­ing image replace­ment, I found Lit­er­ary Moose’s mind­child to be very inno­v­a­tive, although it sadly might not work every­where: http://my.opera.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=46162

by Jarek Piórkowski on May 25, 2004 at 11:35 am. Reply #

Yes, Rochester bor­ders the edge of Lake Ontario, which results in frigid win­ters, not to men­tion intense rain and wind storms.

The thun­der was loud. I can’t even begin to describe it, but the clos­est anal­ogy (or exam­ple) I can think of is that it sounded like the mil­i­tary was test­ing explosives.

The tech­nique I used for Image Replace­ment essen­tially off­sets the text –1000 pix­els, mean­ing the text is actu­ally there, it’s just off­screen. The ben­e­fit of this tech­nique is that when the stylesheet is turned off (or not in use) the text remains in it’s default posi­tion. The stylesheet des­ig­nates the text off­set, so when a stylesheet isn’t used, the text remains static.

by kartooner on May 25, 2004 at 11:47 am. Reply #

Leave your comment

Required.

Required. Not published.

If you have one.